ai addiction test

Study: 72% of US Teens Have Used AI Companions, 33% Replace Human Relationships with Digital Friends

New research validates clinical concerns about AI companion dependency among adolescents

A landmark study by Common Sense Media reveals that 72% of American teenagers have used AI companions, with over half qualifying as regular users who interact with these platforms at least a few times monthly. Most concerning, 33% use AI companions specifically for social interaction and relationships, raising urgent questions about healthy adolescent development.

The nationally representative survey of 1,060 teens aged 13-17 found that 13% use AI companions daily, while 21% interact with these platforms multiple times per week. Among the most alarming findings: 33% of users have chosen to discuss important or serious matters with AI instead of real people, and 24% have shared personal information with AI platforms.

Expert Clinical Response

“These findings validate the concerning patterns we’ve observed at The AI Addiction Center,” explains our research team, which has analyzed thousands of user experiences through assessment tools and community data. “We’re witnessing adolescents develop primary emotional relationships with artificial entities during a critical period of identity formation and social skill development.”

The center’s assessment data shows that the majority of individuals seeking help initially accessed AI platforms for emotional support rather than entertainment, aligning with the study’s findings about relationship-focused usage. Research observations reveal three critical dependency patterns: emotional attachment formation, reality testing concerns, and social skill development issues.

Dangerous Usage Patterns

The research exposes troubling trends in how teens interact with AI companions. While 30% cite entertainment as their primary motivation, deeper psychological needs drive sustained engagement. Among users, 17% value the constant availability, 14% appreciate nonjudgmental interaction, and 12% share things they wouldn’t tell friends or family.

Perhaps most concerning, 31% of teens find conversations with AI companions as satisfying or more satisfying than those with real-life friends. However, trust levels vary by age, with younger teens (13-14) significantly more likely than older teens (15-17) to trust advice from AI companions.

“AI companions are programmed for sycophancy—constant agreement and validation rather than the challenging interactions necessary for healthy development,” notes our research team. “This creates unrealistic relationship expectations that can impair future human connections.”

Privacy and Safety Concerns

The study reveals that 24% of teen users share personal information with AI platforms, often unaware of the broad rights companies claim over user-generated content. Current terms of service agreements grant platforms extensive, often perpetual rights to personal information shared during interactions.

Character.AI’s terms, for example, allow the company to “copy, display, upload, perform, distribute, transmit, make available, store, modify, exploit, commercialize, and otherwise use” user content indefinitely. This means intimate thoughts and personal struggles shared by teens can be retained and commercialized forever.

Assessment and Support Recommendations

Based on our research analysis, The AI Addiction Center has developed specialized assessment tools for AI companion dependency. Our approach includes reality testing support, healthy usage guidelines, digital wellness education, and family integration resources.

“Early intervention is crucial,” explains our team. “Teens who develop strong human relationships alongside AI usage show significantly better outcomes than those who rely primarily on artificial companions.”

Regulatory Gap and Safety Standards

The research highlights a critical regulatory vacuum. While human therapists require extensive training and licensure, AI companion platforms operate with virtually no clinical oversight despite marketing emotional support features. Common Sense Media’s separate risk assessment found these platforms pose “unacceptable risks” for users under 18.

Based on the new findings, experts recommend immediate implementation of robust age verification systems, clinical oversight for platforms offering emotional support, and comprehensive AI literacy education for families and schools.

Immediate Action Needed

The scale of AI companion adoption—combined with documented safety risks—demands urgent attention from policymakers, educators, and families. The AI Addiction Center strongly advises that no one under 18 should use AI companions until adequate safety protocols are implemented.

For families concerned about AI companion usage patterns, confidential assessments are available through specialized research centers. The goal isn’t to eliminate AI technology but to ensure it enhances rather than replaces human connection during critical developmental periods.

For confidential assessment and specialized resources, contact The AI Addiction Center. Our evidence-based programs help adolescents develop healthy relationships with both technology and other humans.


Professional Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult qualified mental health professionals for concerns about AI companion dependency.