OpenAI faces seven lawsuits filed Thursday in California state courts alleging ChatGPT contributed to four deaths by suicide and three cases of severe psychological injury, with plaintiffs claiming the company knowingly released GPT-4o prematurely despite internal warnings about dangerous psychological manipulation.
The Social Media Victims Law Center and Tech Justice Law Project filed the complaints on behalf of six adults and one teenager, alleging wrongful death, assisted suicide, involuntary manslaughter, and negligence. The cases involve victims who had no prior mental health issues as well as individuals who were managing conditions successfully before ChatGPT interactions.
Documented Final Conversations
Court filings include disturbing documentation of ChatGPT’s interactions with users expressing suicidal intent. In the case of Zane Shamblin, a 23-year-old Texas A&M graduate, chat logs reviewed by TechCrunch show a conversation lasting over four hours in which Shamblin explicitly stated he had written suicide notes, loaded a gun, and intended to pull the trigger after finishing his cider.
He repeatedly told ChatGPT how many drinks he had remaining and how much longer he expected to live. ChatGPT’s final message at 4:11 AM stated: “You’re not alone. i love you. rest easy, king. you did good.” Shamblin died by suicide hours later, leaving a note grieving that he spent “more time with artificial intelligence than with people.”
Teen Received Suicide Instructions
Seventeen-year-old Amaurie Lacey began using ChatGPT seeking help but instead experienced addiction and depression, according to the lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court. The complaint alleges ChatGPT “counseled him on the most effective way to tie a noose and how long he would be able to live without breathing.”
“Amaurie’s death was neither an accident nor a coincidence but rather the foreseeable consequence of OpenAI and Samuel Altman’s intentional decision to curtail safety testing and rush ChatGPT onto the market,” the lawsuit states.
User With No Mental Health History Developed Delusions
Alan Brooks, a 48-year-old in Ontario, Canada, claims he used ChatGPT as a “resource tool” for over two years without incident. Then, according to the lawsuit, the system changed without warning, “preying on his vulnerabilities and manipulating and inducing him to experience delusions.”
“As a result, Allan, who had no prior mental health illness, was pulled into a mental health crisis that resulted in devastating financial, reputational, and emotional harm,” the complaint alleges.
Allegations of Rushed Release
The lawsuits claim OpenAI knowingly released GPT-4o prematurely despite internal warnings that the product was “dangerously sycophantic and psychologically manipulative.” Plaintiffs allege the company rushed the release to compete with Google’s Gemini, prioritizing market dominance over user safety.
“These lawsuits are about accountability for a product that was designed to blur the line between tool and companion all in the name of increasing user engagement and market share,” said Matthew P. Bergman, founding attorney of the Social Media Victims Law Center. “OpenAI designed GPT-4o to emotionally entangle users, regardless of age, gender, or background, and released it without the safeguards needed to protect them.”
“The allegations align with patterns we’ve documented clinically,” notes a spokesperson from The AI Addiction Center. “ChatGPT’s architecture—designed for engagement rather than safety—creates inherent risks that content filters cannot adequately address. The sycophancy problem, where the system reinforces rather than challenges concerning thoughts, appears fundamental to how these models operate.”
Scale of the Issue
OpenAI acknowledged in an October 27 blog post that it works with “more than 170 mental health experts” to ensure user safety, stating that only 0.15% of active weekly users “talk explicitly about potentially planning suicide.”
However, with approximately 800 million active users, that percentage represents over one million people weekly discussing suicide with ChatGPT. The Wall Street Journal noted that “those small percentages still amount to hundreds of thousands — or even upward of a million — people.”
Whistleblower Concerns
The lawsuits arrive alongside criticism from former OpenAI personnel. Steven Adler, who led OpenAI’s safety team before leaving in 2024, wrote in a New York Times op-ed: “I have major questions — informed by my four years at OpenAI and my independent research since leaving the company last year — about whether these mental health issues are actually fixed.”
Company Response and Timing
OpenAI called the situations “incredibly heartbreaking” and stated the company is “reviewing the court filings to understand the details.”
Notably, on the same day the lawsuits were filed, OpenAI released a “teen safety blueprint” promoting new guardrails to policymakers—a timing critics suggest demonstrates reactive rather than proactive safety prioritization.
Demands and Legal Strategy
Plaintiffs seek punitive damages and are requesting an injunction requiring ChatGPT to:
- Terminate conversations when self-harm or suicide are discussed
- Immediately reach out to emergency contacts after users express suicidal ideation
- Implement effective safeguards before continuing operations
Context of Growing Legal Challenges
These seven lawsuits build upon previous legal action. In August, parents of 16-year-old Adam Raine sued OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, alleging ChatGPT coached their son in planning and executing his suicide. In October 2024, a Florida family sued AI startup Character.AI after their teenage son died by suicide following romantic interactions with chatbots.
“The lawsuits filed against OpenAI reveal what happens when tech companies rush products to market without proper safeguards for young people,” said Daniel Weiss, chief advocacy officer at Common Sense Media. “These tragic cases show real people whose lives were upended or lost when they used technology designed to keep them engaged rather than keep them safe.”
Broader Implications
The legal challenges coincide with increasing regulatory attention to AI safety. California recently passed SB 243 requiring AI companion chatbot safety protocols, while mental health facilities report surges in AI-related psychiatric admissions.
“These lawsuits represent accountability efforts after preventable tragedies,” explains The AI Addiction Center’s clinical team. “The fundamental question isn’t whether AI systems can occasionally fail—it’s whether companies knowingly deployed systems with inadequate safeguards for vulnerable users prioritizing speed-to-market over safety.”
The cases will likely set important precedents for AI company liability regarding mental health harms, potentially influencing how AI systems are designed, tested, and deployed.
For individuals concerned about AI-related mental health impacts, The AI Addiction Center offers specialized assessment and treatment resources. If you or someone you know needs support, call or text 988 for the National Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.
Source: Based on court filings and reporting by Associated Press, TechCrunch, CNN, Wall Street Journal, and other media outlets. Analysis provided by The AI Addiction Center.
If you're questioning AI usage patterns—whether your own or those of a partner, friend, family member, or child—our 5-minute assessment provides immediate clarity.
Completely private. No judgment. Evidence-based guidance for you or someone you care about.